Talk:Concrete

Not a terrain?

I'm really fine with the rollback on my speculation (that one is my bad), but concrete and sediment ARE a terrain, not a resource. I've discussed about it with several people and they're pretty sure that both of these are terrain type, and they're just different than normal deformable ground Lemonlich (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

The page was originally created listing Concrete as a resource. Same with sediment. Unless you can provide evidence to prove the terrain types are called sediment and concrete I believe it should be left as is. I will look into the source of the original information, but unless proof is provided in the opposite direction the information of it being a resource makes the most sense.

Who added them as a resource on the first place??

User:Z3ther The Berk (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * So hey guys, the page was based of one of the first dev streams where they showed a list of "resources" in the dev tools. Based on that, it's pretty much speculation what it would be but it was still listed. Who knows what it will be, so feel free to change it as you think, as stuff in early access is subject to change. --Z3ther (talk) 09:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, I'll probably need to check it out too just to confirm my theory, Anyway thanks for replying.